From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [Joel.Becker@oracle.com: Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: [PATCH 1/3] dlm: use configfs] Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:48:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20050828224826.GA29406@kroah.com> References: <20050822213220.GH19387@insight.us.oracle.com> <20050822144521.24494329.akpm@osdl.org> <20050822215049.GI19387@insight.us.oracle.com> <20050822150505.7978136d.akpm@osdl.org> <20050824071835.GA10235@lst.de> <20050824203352.GB30246@insight.us.oracle.com> <20050825095819.GA4785@lst.de> <20050825174541.GA21228@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joel Becker , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Wim Coekaerts Return-path: Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:21384 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238AbVH2IPw (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 04:15:52 -0400 To: Mark Fasheh Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050825174541.GA21228@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:45:42AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:58:19AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > - there's still some procfs abuse > > > > > > Specifics of what is abuse vs OK would be interesting. > > > > You're using procfs for non-process data. > > I'm not sure I understand this... Looking through /proc I see lots of > subsystems using /proc in similar ways to us. or is there a very specific > method which you have a problem with? No new subsystems or code shall add /proc files that do not explicitly pertain to process information. thanks, greg k-h