From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932358AbVH3TGl (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:06:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932383AbVH3TGl (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:06:41 -0400 Received: from smtp-102-tuesday.noc.nerim.net ([62.4.17.102]:9478 "EHLO mallaury.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932358AbVH3TGk (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:06:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:06:38 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Paul Jackson Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: Trailing comments in broken-out series file break quilt Message-Id: <20050830210638.69d8918d.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: <20050829191516.4e5d9e0b.pj@sgi.com> References: <20050829191516.4e5d9e0b.pj@sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Paul, > However the quilt command passes these additional terms to the patch > command as additional arguments, confusing the heck out of patch, > and generating an error message that confused the heck out of me. > > Question - should I be asking Andrew not to comment this way, or > should I be asking quilt to recognize a comment convention here? You should simply be using an up-to-date version of quilt, namely version 0.42, which supports Andrew-style comments in series files just fine. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare