From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EAEUY-0007f4-Rq for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:22:06 -0700 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6] helo=lakshmi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EAEUW-0001fp-DR for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:22:06 -0700 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20050830212834.GA10579@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200508292007.j7TK72Or029927@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:28:34 -0400 To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Al Viro On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:42:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > The generic one should work too, it's just less efficient. > So you can probably easily replace them. Yup, just something that hasn't been done yet. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751102AbVH3WVy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:21:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751373AbVH3WVy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:21:54 -0400 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6]:53774 "EHLO lakshmi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751102AbVH3WVx (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:21:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:28:34 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken Message-ID: <20050830212834.GA10579@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200508292007.j7TK72Or029927@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:42:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > The generic one should work too, it's just less efficient. > So you can probably easily replace them. Yup, just something that hasn't been done yet. Jeff