From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Iversen <chrivers@iversen-net.dk>
Subject: Re: WinFS beta out
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:18:06 +0200
Message-ID: <200508310318.07145.chrivers@iversen-net.dk>
References: <e692861c0508292136543a02e1@mail.gmail.com> <200508310100.06889.chrivers@iversen-net.dk> <431502B1.9040903@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25739-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <431502B1.9040903@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

On Wednesday 31 August 2005 03:06, Hans Reiser wrote:
> I strongly feel that ACLs are innately superior by design to Unix
> permissions.  As for the usability issues mentioned, that is mostly due
> to apps not being used to them, and is a critical mass issue and UI
> implementation issue, not anything more.  I just wanted to say that, so
> that all will know that it is only the implementation and UI that I
> object to, not the objective.  The objective is good.

I mostly agree with that - I'm sorry I didn't make it very clear in the post.

-- 
Regards,
Christian Iversen