From: Stefan Kombrink <katakombi@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs. win4lin pro
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:40:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509010840.52069.katakombi@web.de> (raw)
Hi there,
I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user
pay 89$ for it?
greetings,
Stefan K. >8^)
next reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 6:40 Stefan Kombrink [this message]
2005-09-01 8:10 ` [Qemu-devel] qemu vs. win4lin pro John R. Hogerhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509010840.52069.katakombi@web.de \
--to=katakombi@gmail.com \
--cc=katakombi@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.