From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EAix0-00089G-Rp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:53:31 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EAiwy-00088Q-Cg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:53:30 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAiwx-0007wm-9n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:53:27 -0400
Received: from [64.233.184.203] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EAihs-0000vy-SG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:37:52 -0400
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so268462wra
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:40:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200509010840.52069.katakombi@web.de>
From: Stefan Kombrink <katakombi@gmail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs. win4lin pro
Reply-To: katakombi@web.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi there,

 I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user 
pay 89$ for it?

 greetings,
 Stefan K. >8^)