From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:49:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050901144956.GB83@DervishD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4316EAD1.70300@ens-lyon.org>
Salut Brice :)
* Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> dixit:
> Le 01.09.2005 13:36, DervishD a écrit :
> > The lack of speed seems to affect only the OHCI driver. My test
> > was done over a PCI USB 2.0 card, ALi chipset, OHCI driver (well
> > EHCI+OHCI) and using a full speed device capable of 12MBps. The
> > average measured speeds are:
> >
> > - 2.4.31: about 450Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.11-Debian: about 800Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.11.12: about 820Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.12.x: about 200Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.13: about 200Kb/seg
> Are you mounting this storage with vfat and 'sync' option ?
Yes, that may be the problem, but I think that is not the only
problem, see below.
> IIRC, sync support for vfat was added around 2.6.12, making
> write way slower since it's now really synchron.
The fact is that if I mount the device under 2.4.31 using the
'sync' option, the speed are the ones shown above, but if I mount
them with 'async', the speed is that of the light ;) I mean, the
'sync' option is doing something even in 2.4.31. The same applies to
2.6.11, but I have to test in 2.6.12 & 13.
Thanks for your help. If the problem is just that, the sync
option, I'll drop a note to the mailing list. Merci mille fois ;)
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 11:36 USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12 DervishD
2005-09-01 11:49 ` Brice Goglin
2005-09-01 14:49 ` DervishD [this message]
2005-09-01 16:23 ` [SOLVED] " DervishD
2005-09-01 16:31 ` Mark Lord
2005-09-01 17:29 ` DervishD
2005-09-01 12:29 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-09-01 20:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-09-01 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050901144956.GB83@DervishD \
--to=lkml@dervishd.net \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.