From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030423AbVIAVuf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:50:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030419AbVIAVuf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:50:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:61838 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030423AbVIAVud (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:50:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:52:48 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Bill Davidsen Cc: lkml@dervishd.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12 Message-Id: <20050901145248.2356f03f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <43176095.1000805@tmr.com> References: <20050901113614.GA63@DervishD> <43176095.1000805@tmr.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bill Davidsen wrote: > > I see a worse problem, I load the driver, mount the filesystems on the > USB 160GB disk, and the disk just "goes away." I see the devices in > /proc/scsi/scsi but I can't access the devices any more. Definitely time > for a fallback to a more stable kernel! Please us get 2.6.13 fixed first. Can you generate the dmesg output for good and bad kernels, diff them and see if there's anything useful there? What does "can't access" mean? -EIO?