From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Vier Subject: Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 10:01:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20050907140146.GA17621@zero> References: <4317FD1B.504@namesys.com> <431A5E43.4060005@slaphack.com> <431A6E71.4060105@namesys.com> <20050906135951.GA12333@zero> Reply-To: Tom Vier Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Gregory Maxwell Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:36:33PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On 9/6/05, Tom Vier wrote: > > My vote: put the reserve % in the superblock (if it isn't already) and > > give mkfs a sane default. > > Looking at the code it appears it would be easier to make it a mount > option that defaults to 5%. Would that work okay for you? I think that's better than a #define, but i'd still prefer something a little more sticky than a mount option (a field in the superblock). You might manually mount it and forget to specify it. I could certainly live with it as a mount option, but i think putting it in the superblock is the correct place, imho. -- Tom Vier DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE