From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Anderson Subject: Re: Pending patches Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:42:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20050907194236.GA26071@us.ibm.com> References: <1126104473.4823.8.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:49580 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932233AbVIGTnC (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:43:02 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j87Jh1HS013405 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:43:01 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j87Jh1pu092414 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:43:01 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j87Jh1un002984 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:43:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1126104473.4823.8.camel@mulgrave> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Alan Stern , SCSI development list James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 16:17 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238726326927&w=2 On as542. The first hunk of the diff is already in (declare of scsi_host_set_state). The second hunk looks good (SHOST_RECOVERY label). The third hunk I will take in combination with the other patch that effects the scan code. This should have probably been another patch. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238771326644&w=2 Have not looked at this yet, but will look at it in combination to the above scan change. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238804301664&w=2 Do we need to revist how we are walking these lists for cleanup post James's kilst fix / update? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112238825727146&w=2 This looks ok for an added check, but I guess I need to look at old mail and understand how we got here with the added scan mutex. > > I was hoping that Mike Anderson would review these, but since he hasn't > I'll take a look. Sorry asleep at the keyboard on these. Comments above if you have not already looked at them. -andmike -- Michael Anderson andmike@us.ibm.com