From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751367AbVIHOcT (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:32:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751369AbVIHOcT (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:32:19 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:20153 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751367AbVIHOcS (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:32:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 15:32:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Beulich Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition Message-ID: <20050908143216.GA9665@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Jan Beulich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4320670B0200007800024411@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4320670B0200007800024411@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get > line wrapped.) > > A trivial addition to the EFL definitions. Why? They're obviously not needed in kernelspace.. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > diff -Npru 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h > --- 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h 2005-08-29 01:41:01.000000000 +0200 > +++ 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h 2005-03-16 12:24:42.000000000 > +0100 > @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ typedef __s64 Elf64_Sxword; > #define STT_FUNC 2 > #define STT_SECTION 3 > #define STT_FILE 4 > +#define STT_COMMON 5 > +#define STT_TLS 6 > > #define ELF_ST_BIND(x) ((x) >> 4) > #define ELF_ST_TYPE(x) (((unsigned int) x) & 0xf) > ---end quoted text---