From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EDSMg-00081v-O7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:47:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EDSMV-0007wb-DH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:47:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EDSMS-0007sO-NM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:47:04 -0400 Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EDSDF-0006YR-P5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:37:33 -0400 Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.253.219]) by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j88JWsrD023099 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 15:32:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 15:32:52 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Why, Fabrice? (CORRECTION: adlib emulation NOT compiled in the default binary?) Message-ID: <20050908193252.GA28476@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <20050906113830.49713.qmail@web30012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050906113830.49713.qmail@web30012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:38:30AM -0700, user user wrote: > Why isn't the adlib emulation compiled in the default > binary? Please do that. > > It's this one: > [qemu-0.7.2-i386.tar.gz - Binary distribution for > linux-i386 (untar it in '/').] > Wasn't there an issue with adlib emulation that caused problems with Windows guests? (I know that malc_'s recent audio patches fix the problem, but I don't know if they've been committed to CVS yet or not.) -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.