From: Mathias Adam <a2@adamis.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rmk+serial@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8250.c: Fix to make 16C950 UARTs work
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:49:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050909024926.GA13643@adamis.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4320EC45.1080108@stesmi.com>
Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Mathias Adam wrote:
> > Currently serial8250_set_termios() refuses to program a baud rate larger
> > than uartclk/16. However the 16C950 supports baud rates up to uartclk/4.
> > This worked already with Linux 2.4 so the biggest part of this patch was
> > simply taken from there and adapted to 2.6.
> > - unsigned int baud, quot;
> > + unsigned int baud, quot, max_baud;
> ^^^^^^^^
> > - baud = uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios, old, 0, port->uartclk/16);
> > + MAX_baud = (up->port.type == PORT_16C950 ? port->uartclk/4 : port->uartclk/16);
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> Did you even compile test this?
Oops, I really really wonder how THIS could have happened as I just attached
my existing patch file (which was and still is correct) without touching
it - at least that's what I thought... Sorry!
Mathias Adam
I hope everything's alright this time:
--- linux-2.6.13-org/drivers/serial/8250.c 2005-08-29 01:41:01.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/drivers/serial/8250.c 2005-09-09 02:16:49.000000000 +0200
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@
struct uart_8250_port *up = (struct uart_8250_port *)port;
unsigned char cval, fcr = 0;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned int baud, quot;
+ unsigned int baud, quot, max_baud;
switch (termios->c_cflag & CSIZE) {
case CS5:
@@ -1697,9 +1697,28 @@
/*
* Ask the core to calculate the divisor for us.
*/
- baud = uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios, old, 0, port->uartclk/16);
+ max_baud = (up->port.type == PORT_16C950 ? port->uartclk/4 : port->uartclk/16);
+ baud = uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios, old, 0, max_baud);
quot = serial8250_get_divisor(port, baud);
+ /*
+ * 16C950 supports additional prescaler ratios between 1:16 and 1:4
+ * thus increasing max baud rate to uartclk/4. The following was taken
+ * from kernel 2.4 by Mathias Adam <a2@adamis.de> to make the Socket
+ * Bluetooth CF Card work under 2.6.13.
+ */
+ if (up->port.type == PORT_16C950) {
+ unsigned int baud_base = port->uartclk/16;
+ if (baud <= port->uartclk/16)
+ serial_icr_write(up, UART_TCR, 0);
+ else if (baud <= port->uartclk/8) {
+ serial_icr_write(up, UART_TCR, 0x8);
+ } else if (baud <= port->uartclk/4) {
+ serial_icr_write(up, UART_TCR, 0x4);
+ } else
+ serial_icr_write(up, UART_TCR, 0);
+ }
+
/*
* Oxford Semi 952 rev B workaround
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-09 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 1:31 [PATCH] 8250.c: Fix to make 16C950 UARTs work Mathias Adam
2005-09-09 1:58 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2005-09-09 2:49 ` Mathias Adam [this message]
2005-09-09 10:18 ` Russell King
2005-09-09 14:42 ` Mathias Adam
2005-09-16 12:11 ` Mathias Adam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050909024926.GA13643@adamis.de \
--to=a2@adamis.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+serial@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.