From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] aacraid: error return checking Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:06:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20050913100646.GD30375@infradead.org> References: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F01919BC0@otce2k03.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:22455 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbVIMKGt (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 06:06:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F01919BC0@otce2k03.adaptec.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Salyzyn, Mark" Cc: Mark Haverkamp , James Bottomley , linux-scsi On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:19:56AM -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > We get complains about a driver module loaded with no associated > hardware. There are system configurations that probe for installed > hardware by loading modules, they expect only the functional driver > modules to load. What purpose is there in a driver module that is loaded > with no hardware? Allow for hot-plug devices to be hanled without further user-space invention. Your above probing method will have the same effect on every modern driver.