From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:11:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20050920211136.GA6179@thunk.org> References: <200509182004.j8IK4JNx012764@inti.inf.utfsm.cl> <432E5024.20709@namesys.com> <20050920075133.GB4074@elf.ucw.cz> <43301FA0.7030906@slaphack.com> <20050920175727.GA17820@thunk.org> <1127240326.10407.22.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1127240326.10407.22.camel@localhost> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jonathan Briggs Cc: David Masover , Pavel Machek , Hans Reiser , Horst von Brand , thenewme91@gmail.com, Christoph Hellwig , Denis Vlasenko , chriswhite@gentoo.org, LKML , ReiserFS List On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:18:46PM -0600, Jonathan Briggs wrote: > > I use Reiser3 and Reiser4 on all my systems and fsck has always worked > even if it has been much slower than I would like. The only problems > I've experienced have been on the same level as when an ext2/3 > filesystem fsck dumps several directories of unlabeled files into lost > +found. You've obviously never kept several dozen reiserfs filesystem images (for use with Xen or User-Mode Linux) on a reiserfs filesystem, and then had a hardware failure bad enough that the fsck had to try to rebuild the b-tree, I take it? - Ted