All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
To: Robert.Boermans@uk.telex.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bogomips on AMD X2 (was Re:)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:53:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509211653.17999.vda@ilport.com.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF73453AE5.CDE706CC-ON80257083.004ACF55-80257083.004B7A0F@telex.com>

> > I noticed that the bogomips results for the two cores on my machine are 
> > consistently not the same, the second one is always reported slightly 
> > faster, it's a small difference and I saw the same in a posted dmesg 
> from 
> > somebody else on the list. Which made me wonder: 
> 
> I guess it's a cache warming effect. Please show the numbers.
>
> Probably not, got this one from a web site, and on this one the first core 
> seems to be faster (can't check my own machine it's off and at home and 
> I'm at work.) The difference I get is similar, but always with the second 
> one faster. It's the same when using cat on /proc/cpuinfo. Oh and I saw it 
> on 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 as supplied with fedora core 4 myself.
> 
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4014.73 BogoMIPS 
> (lpj=8029470)
...
> Initializing CPU#1
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4005.37 BogoMIPS 
> (lpj=8010751)

Why do you think it cannot be a cache warming effect?
--
vda

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-21 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-21 13:20 Robert.Boermans
2005-09-21 13:27 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-09-21 13:44   ` Bogomips on AMD X2 (was Robert.Boermans
2005-09-21 13:53     ` Denis Vlasenko [this message]
2005-09-21 14:02       ` Robert.Boermans
2005-09-21 14:14         ` OT: " Clemens Koller
2005-09-21 13:58     ` Michael Concannon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200509211653.17999.vda@ilport.com.ua \
    --to=vda@ilport.com.ua \
    --cc=Robert.Boermans@uk.telex.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.