From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: make mkpatches Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:58:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20050923015843.GA16352@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: James Harper Cc: Chris Wright , Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org * James Harper (james.harper@bendigoit.com.au) wrote: > > > > Sounds like you're not picking up the patches that get applied to the > > base tree from patches/linux-2.6.12/ (btw, the smp_alts.patch won't > > compile on plain x86, it's missing a trivial fix). > > That sounds plausible. I assumed that mkpatches would do this. Should I > apply these patches/linux-2.6.12/* before or after applying the > mkpatches-generated patch? Apply them before the mkpatches patch.