From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: /dev/rob0 Subject: Re: Iptables and vlan interfaces Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:55:11 -0500 Message-ID: <200509300855.11169.rob0@gmx.co.uk> References: <20050930112129.19898.qmail@focomunicatii.ro> <200509300839.15330.rob0@gmx.co.uk> <20050930134152.GG25248@torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050930134152.GG25248@torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Friday 2005-September-30 08:41, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:39:15AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > Hmmm, I had always thought you couldn't use virtual interfaces. > > # iptables -vI INPUT -i eth0:101 > > You are obviously missing the BIG difference between an alias > interface and an interface connected to a VLAN. Obviously! > Please refrain from giving advice if you do not _EXACTLY_ know that > what you say is correct. Please try to understand the difference between "giving advice" and "asking a question." -- mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header