From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EM7h8-0000Bd-Ok for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:32:14 -0700 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1EM7h3-0005gr-S6 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:32:11 -0700 From: Al Viro Message-ID: <20051002173203.GQ7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <200510021213.40191.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20051002113806.GO7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> <200510021350.29959.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510021350.29959.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: UML/2.6.14-rc3 doesn't work fixes Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 18:32:03 +0100 To: Blaisorblade Cc: Jeff Dike , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Alexander Viro On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 01:50:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Sunday 02 October 2005 13:38, Al Viro wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:13:39PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > > The patch in Al Viro's: > > > > ecba97d4aacf4e80c56eb73e39af0369cb8539a4 > > > > messed up UML (in particular skas0, which doesn't boot any more - or > > > maybe it boots one out of 10 times). > > > > Btw: did Al CC you on it, at least? > > > Yes. Moreover, that had also been done two weeks ago when original version > > of patch had been sent for review to Jeff. Who'd caught that one and other > > bugs and sent the fixed variant back. At which point I'd fscked up the > > merge. > > Ok, you're excused... now, however, I still think that this should be > postponed to 2.6.15, since it's a (very nice, indeed) cleanup and we're > nearing completion. > > Al, did you receive my "[PATCH 5/5] uml: remove empty hostfs_truncate method"? > What about that? What about that? Obvious patch that got no objections from anybody and AFAICS got in -rc3: ; git-whatchanged fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c|head diff-tree daa35edc0a967d1f77c2e2c1346f57d04371487a (from bd948057357db5febfe64cf7a9ef11d7e347ffec) Author: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Date: Fri Sep 30 11:59:01 2005 -0700 [PATCH] uml: remove empty hostfs_truncate method Calling truncate() on hostfs spits a kernel warning "Something isn't implemented here", but it still works fine. Indeed, hostfs i_op->truncate doesn't do anything. But hostfs_setattr() -> ; Judging by Signed-off-by it looks like a -mm -> Linus merge... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel