From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/platform.h
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051003215053.GI3652@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12c511ca0510031407i5266cf4ak5082ec54f60a3d17@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:07:12PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> > The default_idle() prototype should stay inside some header file.
>
> That would be best, yes.
>
> > @Patrick:
> > Any suggestion where it should move to?
>
> Of the include files already included directly by arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c,
> <linux/sched.h> looks the most promising. There's lots of .*idle.* things
> already in there.
>
> Looking at existing precedent: ppc64 has a definition of default_idle()
> in <asm/machdep.h>
The question whether linux/ or asm/ is the best place for the definition
boils down to the question whether it is expected that default_idle() is
present on all architectures or whether it's an architecture-specific
implementation detail.
In the first case, I'm surprised that there is no platform independent
code using it.
In the second case, it seems we can kill the default_idle() functions on
mips (empty) and parisk.
> i396, cris and um already have gone along the route of adding extern
> definitions for default_idle() to ".c" files ... so cleanup creates more
> opportunities for cleanup (but you are probably very experienced in
> this phenomenom :-)
I stumbled across the question whether include/linux/platform.h is still
required by cleaning up warnings with the -Wmissing-prototypes compiler
flag I plan to add to the kernel CFLAGS soon that generates warnings
for such extern constructs...
> -Tony
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-03 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-02 20:52 2.6: is include/linux/platform.h a dead header? Adrian Bunk
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.50.0509291106520.29808-100000@monsoon.he.net>
2005-10-01 23:34 ` [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/platform.h Adrian Bunk
2005-10-03 19:01 ` Tony Luck
2005-10-03 19:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-10-03 21:07 ` Tony Luck
2005-10-03 21:50 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-10-10 18:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-03 18:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-08 19:46 ` Patrick Mochel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051003215053.GI3652@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@digitalimplant.org \
--cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.