From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix block-detach of non-existent device
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 00:13:04 +0100
Message-ID: <20051004231304.GA16856@uk.xensource.com>
References: <87k6gtx7et.fsf@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k6gtx7et.fsf@us.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:07:54PM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:

> The attached patch prevents Xend from blowing up when a user tries to
> detach a non-existent block device.
> 
> I also added a check in xm to make sure that a numeric id is supplied,
> instead of a device name.
> 
> This will cause xm-test 04_block-destroy_nonattached_neg to pass.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com>

Thanks Dan.  I've applied that.

Ewan.