From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S965098AbVJEKH5@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S965098AbVJEKH5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 06:07:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965100AbVJEKH5
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 06:07:57 -0400
Received: from free.hands.com ([83.142.228.128]:22435 "EHLO free.hands.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965098AbVJEKH5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 06:07:57 -0400
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:07:48 +0100
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>, Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
Message-ID: <20051005100748.GM10538@lkcl.net>
References: <20051002204703.GG6290@lkcl.net> <4342DC4D.8090908@perkel.com> <200510041840.55820.chase.venters@clientec.com> <200510050535.j955ZwVE021603@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200510050535.j955ZwVE021603@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-hands-com-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lkcl@lkcl.net
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:35:57AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:40:33 CDT, Chase Venters said:
> > Work on dbus and HAL should give us good improvements in these areas. One

 HAL is great.  dbus should have been shot at birth and the people who
 initiated it without looking at freedce should have been fired.

 l.