From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] map multiple blocks at a time in mpage_readpage(s)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:41:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051005161158.GA4444@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051005071037.GA27081@lst.de>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:10:37AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:04:48AM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> > > page->index, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > > bio = do_mpage_readpage(bio, page,
> > > nr_pages - page_idx,
> > > - &last_block_in_bio, get_block);
> > > + &last_block_in_bio, &map_bh,
> > > + &first_logical_block, &map_valid,
> > > + get_blocks, get_block);
> >
> > Oh, function taking 9 arguments, please... this is not windows.
>
> I'm happy about suggestion to reduce the count. One of the real
> problems is that the buffer_head structure is extremly badly suited for
> the get_blocks callback. Having information like in the xfs_iomap_t
> structure (which is XFS bmap information container) would simplify lots
> of these things.
In the writepages case, I ultimately ended up defining an mpageio
structure somewhat like the DIO code.
>
>
> > By the way, I cannot see where get_block callback is used by mpage.c
> > code, why is it needed?
>
> It's only used by block_read_full_page which is called in the 'confused'
> case.
Having a readpage_fn callback may be a little bit better than this, but
yes this is when one really starts wanting to get rid of bufferheads ...
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Regards
Suparna
--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-05 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-04 19:42 [PATCH, RFC] map multiple blocks at a time in mpage_readpage(s) Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-04 22:05 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-10-04 23:15 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-05 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-07 22:13 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-05 6:04 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-10-05 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-05 16:11 ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2005-10-19 11:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-19 15:07 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-10-20 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-21 6:18 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-10-21 12:53 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-10-21 14:16 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051005161158.GA4444@in.ibm.com \
--to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.