From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Removing BROKEN scsi drivers Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:23:41 +0200 Message-ID: <200510061223.41800.ak@suse.de> References: <200510051314.33411.ak@suse.de> <4344556B.3030700@torque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:64648 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750789AbVJFKXY (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 06:23:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4344556B.3030700@torque.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: dougg@torque.net Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 October 2005 00:36, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > So whoever marked the advansys driver as broken > was making some political statement IMO. If it > ain't broken, it shouldn't be marked as BROKEN. Well if it's not broken it should be marked unbroken. If it only works on x86 as hch stated one way would be to make it dependent on (X86 && !X86_64) -Andi