From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750805AbVJFKmU (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 06:42:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750806AbVJFKmU (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 06:42:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48301 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805AbVJFKmT (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 06:42:19 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Siddha, Suresh B" Subject: Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:42:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, akpm@osdl.org References: <20051005161706.B30098@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20051005161706.B30098@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510061242.26563.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 October 2005 01:17, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT > +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64 > +#include > +#else > +#include > +#endif Having such ifdefs is a clear cue that the code shouldn't be shared between architectures. -Andi