All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] add sysfs to dynamically control blk request tag maintenance
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:41:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051007074138.GP2889@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB5086AEC2E@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 07 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote on Friday, October 07, 2005 12:24 AM
> > I don't understand the need for this patch - the generic tagging is
> only
> > used if the SCSI LLD indicated it wanted it by issuing a
> > scsi_activate_tcq(). So blk_queue_start_tag() is only called if the
> LLD
> > already did a scsi_activate_tcq(), and blk_queue_end_tag() is only
> > called if the rq is block layer tagged. blk_queue_find_tag() is only
> > used with direct use of scsi_find_tag(), a function that should (and
> is)
> > only usable by users of the generic tagging already.
> > 
> 
> You beat me by a couple of minutes.  I was about to say that the culprit
> is in the qla2x00 driver where it unnecessarily activated generic blk
> tag queuing by calling scsi_activate_tcq() and it never uses tag.
> 
> > So please, a description of what problem you are trying to solve would
> > be appreciated :-)
> 
> It starts out with scsi_end_request being a fairly hot function in the
> execution profile, then I noticed blk_queue_start/end_tag() are being
> called but no actual consumer of using the tag.  I'm trying to find a
> way to avoid making these blk_queue_start/end_tag calls.  I got the
> answer
> now. The proper way is to fix it in the scsi LLDD.  Scratch this patch,
> new patch to follow :-)

Ok that makes more sense! But it's a little worrying that
blk_queue_end_tag() would show up as hot in the profile, it is actually
quite lean.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-07  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-07  7:35 [RFC] add sysfs to dynamically control blk request tag maintenance Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07  7:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-10-07  7:50   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-07  8:06     ` Jens Axboe
2005-10-07  8:25       ` Arjan van de Ven
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-07  8:13 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07 16:57 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-10-07 18:17   ` Jens Axboe
2005-10-07  8:04 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07  7:52 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07  8:07 ` Jens Axboe
2005-10-07  2:46 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-10-07  7:23 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051007074138.GP2889@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.