From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christophe Lucas Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:54:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] printk : kernel/softirq.c Message-Id: <20051007105416.GC11049@titux.mcom.fr> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============37652504288645772==" List-Id: References: <03ca01c5cb00$c020f0f0$5f051aac@pcp42831> In-Reply-To: <03ca01c5cb00$c020f0f0$5f051aac@pcp42831> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============37652504288645772== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Milind A Choudhary(Patni) (milind.choudhary@patni.com) wrote: > > Christophe Lucas [clucas@rotomalug.org] Wrote:: > > > > >Milind A Choudhary(Patni) (milind.choudhary@patni.com) wrote: > >> Description: > >> printk() calls should include appropriate KERN_* constant. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Milind A Choudhary > > > >Hi, > > > >You seems to make printk patch. Have you made all patches for arch/i386 > >as you have begun ? > > > These are my first patches thats why i thougt > doing some printk work would be a good startup.. > I've started looking into kernel/* > haven't yet looked at arch/i386. > are you planning to take it up? No in a really next future. > > I'd like to know how do we,@ KJ, ensure that there is no repetition of work.. > is the work delegated or voluntarily taken up throgh such discussions only? > kindly let me know. As we do now : we ask on this ml :) Have a nice day, - Christophe (clucas@rotomalug.org) --===============37652504288645772== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============37652504288645772==--