From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Welte Subject: Re: BUG() in ip_ct_event_cache_flush()? Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:35:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20051007213523.GD4719@rama> References: <20051005.234046.88863607.davem@davemloft.net> <20051007040906.GC5953@rama> <20051006.131408.24379607.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cz6wLo+OExbGG7q/" Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, kaber@trash.net Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051006.131408.24379607.davem@davemloft.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --cz6wLo+OExbGG7q/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:14:08PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:40:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > >=20 > > > I've seen an OOPS backtrace with current 2.6.x kernels > > > that seems to be in ip_ct_event_cache_flush(). > >=20 > > :( do you have the oops/backtrace? >=20 > It's in a Fedora bug report here: >=20 > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D169981 Oh, a fedora kernel. I received some reports that fedora kernel changelog claims to have the event cache fix, but in reality it is not applied. =20 People who switched from fedora to a current git kernel have reported that the problem has gone away. Anyway, the bug report from the link above talks about=20 Call Trace:{:ip_conntrack:ip_conntrack_cleanup+20} {:ip_conntrack:init_or_cleanup+676} {sys_delete_module+490} {syscall_trace_enter+217> {tracesys+209} which seesm to have no relation to the event cahce, but rather some module unload problem. Are you sure that bug report is the right one? > The reporter is running an SMP AMD64 kernel on a laptop, FWIW. mh, I could try that since I'm having a Turion64 notebook... but never had the idea to run an smp kernel on it. --=20 - Harald Welte http://netfilter.org/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie --cz6wLo+OExbGG7q/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRuobXaXGVTD0i/8RAoEqAJ9UQ6PJS3MQg7jPJYJ1CcPLudSRqQCglc1J rT/qFHLMUKFiMSuWgd2KNbE= =d7sz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cz6wLo+OExbGG7q/--