All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, prasanna@in.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] Kprobes: Track kprobe on a per_cpu basis - ppc64 changes
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:43:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051010144343.GF4389@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051010144248.GE4389@in.ibm.com>

From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>

PPC64 changes to track kprobe execution on a per-cpu basis. We now track
the kprobe state machine independently on each cpu using an arch specific
kprobe control block.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
---

 arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c |   94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 include/asm-ppc64/kprobes.h |   15 +++++++
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.14-rc3/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14-rc3.orig/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c	2005-10-05 15:23:42.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc3/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c	2005-10-05 15:32:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -37,12 +37,8 @@
 #include <asm/sstep.h>
 
 static DECLARE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex);
-
-static struct kprobe *current_kprobe;
-static unsigned long kprobe_status, kprobe_saved_msr;
-static struct kprobe *kprobe_prev;
-static unsigned long kprobe_status_prev, kprobe_saved_msr_prev;
-static struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
 
 int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
@@ -108,18 +104,25 @@ static inline void prepare_singlestep(st
 		regs->nip = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
 }
 
-static inline void save_previous_kprobe(void)
+static inline void save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
+{
+	kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
+	kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
+	kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_msr = kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;
+}
+
+static inline void restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
 {
-	kprobe_prev = current_kprobe;
-	kprobe_status_prev = kprobe_status;
-	kprobe_saved_msr_prev = kprobe_saved_msr;
+	__get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = kcb->prev_kprobe.kp;
+	kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
+	kcb->kprobe_saved_msr = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_msr;
 }
 
-static inline void restore_previous_kprobe(void)
+static inline void set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
+				struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
 {
-	current_kprobe = kprobe_prev;
-	kprobe_status = kprobe_status_prev;
-	kprobe_saved_msr = kprobe_saved_msr_prev;
+	__get_cpu_var(current_kprobe) = p;
+	kcb->kprobe_saved_msr = regs->msr;
 }
 
 void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp,
@@ -145,6 +148,7 @@ static inline int kprobe_handler(struct 
 	struct kprobe *p;
 	int ret = 0;
 	unsigned int *addr = (unsigned int *)regs->nip;
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
 
 	/* Check we're not actually recursing */
 	if (kprobe_running()) {
@@ -153,10 +157,10 @@ static inline int kprobe_handler(struct 
 		p = get_kprobe(addr);
 		if (p) {
 			kprobe_opcode_t insn = *p->ainsn.insn;
-			if (kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
+			if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
 					is_trap(insn)) {
 				regs->msr &= ~MSR_SE;
-				regs->msr |= kprobe_saved_msr;
+				regs->msr |= kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;
 				unlock_kprobes();
 				goto no_kprobe;
 			}
@@ -166,15 +170,15 @@ static inline int kprobe_handler(struct 
 			 * just single step on the instruction of the new probe
 			 * without calling any user handlers.
 			 */
-			save_previous_kprobe();
-			current_kprobe = p;
-			kprobe_saved_msr = regs->msr;
+			save_previous_kprobe(kcb);
+			set_current_kprobe(p, regs, kcb);
+			kcb->kprobe_saved_msr = regs->msr;
 			p->nmissed++;
 			prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
-			kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
+			kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
 			return 1;
 		} else {
-			p = current_kprobe;
+			p = __get_cpu_var(current_kprobe);
 			if (p->break_handler && p->break_handler(p, regs)) {
 				goto ss_probe;
 			}
@@ -214,16 +218,15 @@ static inline int kprobe_handler(struct 
 	 * in post_kprobe_handler().
 	 */
 	preempt_disable();
-	kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
-	current_kprobe = p;
-	kprobe_saved_msr = regs->msr;
+	kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
+	set_current_kprobe(p, regs, kcb);
 	if (p->pre_handler && p->pre_handler(p, regs))
 		/* handler has already set things up, so skip ss setup */
 		return 1;
 
 ss_probe:
 	prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
-	kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
+	kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
 	return 1;
 
 no_kprobe:
@@ -292,6 +295,7 @@ int __kprobes trampoline_probe_handler(s
 	BUG_ON(!orig_ret_address || (orig_ret_address == trampoline_address));
 	regs->nip = orig_ret_address;
 
+	reset_current_kprobe();
 	unlock_kprobes();
 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
 
@@ -324,22 +328,26 @@ static void __kprobes resume_execution(s
 
 static inline int post_kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	if (!kprobe_running())
+	struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
+	if (!cur)
 		return 0;
 
-	if ((kprobe_status != KPROBE_REENTER) && current_kprobe->post_handler) {
-		kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
-		current_kprobe->post_handler(current_kprobe, regs, 0);
+	if ((kcb->kprobe_status != KPROBE_REENTER) && cur->post_handler) {
+		kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
+		cur->post_handler(cur, regs, 0);
 	}
 
-	resume_execution(current_kprobe, regs);
-	regs->msr |= kprobe_saved_msr;
+	resume_execution(cur, regs);
+	regs->msr |= kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;
 
 	/*Restore back the original saved kprobes variables and continue. */
-	if (kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER) {
-		restore_previous_kprobe();
+	if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER) {
+		restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
 		goto out;
 	}
+	reset_current_kprobe();
 	unlock_kprobes();
 out:
 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
@@ -358,15 +366,18 @@ out:
 /* Interrupts disabled, kprobe_lock held. */
 static inline int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
 {
-	if (current_kprobe->fault_handler
-	    && current_kprobe->fault_handler(current_kprobe, regs, trapnr))
+	struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
+	if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, trapnr))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (kprobe_status & KPROBE_HIT_SS) {
-		resume_execution(current_kprobe, regs);
+	if (kcb->kprobe_status & KPROBE_HIT_SS) {
+		resume_execution(cur, regs);
 		regs->msr &= ~MSR_SE;
-		regs->msr |= kprobe_saved_msr;
+		regs->msr |= kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;
 
+		reset_current_kprobe();
 		unlock_kprobes();
 		preempt_enable_no_resched();
 	}
@@ -412,8 +423,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(s
 int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
 
-	memcpy(&jprobe_saved_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+	memcpy(&kcb->jprobe_saved_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
 
 	/* setup return addr to the jprobe handler routine */
 	regs->nip = (unsigned long)(((func_descr_t *)jp->entry)->entry);
@@ -433,12 +445,14 @@ void __kprobes jprobe_return_end(void)
 
 int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+
 	/*
 	 * FIXME - we should ideally be validating that we got here 'cos
 	 * of the "trap" in jprobe_return() above, before restoring the
 	 * saved regs...
 	 */
-	memcpy(regs, &jprobe_saved_regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+	memcpy(regs, &kcb->jprobe_saved_regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
 	return 1;
 }
 
Index: linux-2.6.14-rc3/include/asm-ppc64/kprobes.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14-rc3.orig/include/asm-ppc64/kprobes.h	2005-09-30 17:17:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc3/include/asm-ppc64/kprobes.h	2005-10-05 15:31:15.000000000 -0400
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
  */
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
 
 struct pt_regs;
 
@@ -54,6 +55,20 @@ struct arch_specific_insn {
 	kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
 };
 
+struct prev_kprobe {
+	struct kprobe *kp;
+	unsigned long status;
+	unsigned long saved_msr;
+};
+
+/* per-cpu kprobe control block */
+struct kprobe_ctlblk {
+	unsigned long kprobe_status;
+	unsigned long kprobe_saved_msr;
+	struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
+	struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
 extern int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 				    unsigned long val, void *data);

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-10 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-10 14:37 [PATCH 0/9] Kprobes: scalability enhancements Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] Kprobes: rearrange preempt_disable/enable() calls Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:41   ` [PATCH 2/9] Kprobes: Track kprobe on a per_cpu basis - base changes Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:42     ` [PATCH 3/9] Kprobes: Track kprobe on a per_cpu basis - i386 changes Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:42       ` [PATCH 4/9] Kprobes: Track kprobe on a per_cpu basis - ia64 changes Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:43         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2005-10-10 14:44           ` [PATCH 6/9] Kprobes: Track kprobe on a per_cpu basis - sparc64 changes Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:45             ` [PATCH 7/9] Kprobes: Track kprobe on a per_cpu basis - x86_64 changes Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:47               ` [PATCH 8/9] Kprobes: Use RCU for (un)register synchronization - base changes Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-10 14:48                 ` [PATCH 9/9] Kprobes: Use RCU for (un)register synchronization - arch changes Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-18  5:49                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-18 14:45                     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-18 16:35                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-18  5:44                 ` [PATCH 8/9] Kprobes: Use RCU for (un)register synchronization - base changes Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-18 14:43                   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2005-10-18 16:31                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-18 17:09                       ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051010144343.GF4389@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.