From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix iptables on systems with discontiguous processor ids Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20051012.003430.08271591.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20051012062218.GA2712@frankengul.org> <20051011.233149.40160652.davem@davemloft.net> <434CB56D.7050508@frankengul.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: seb@frankengul.org In-Reply-To: <434CB56D.7050508@frankengul.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org From: S=E9bastien Bernard Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:04:13 +0200 > unable to handle paging_request (some zeros...)140098000 This 0x140098000 is in the VMALLOC area, presumable this is an unmapped out-of-range VMALLOC address. > iptables_restor(2488): Oops [#1] > TPC: I guess there is still some indexing problem in Harald's patch, which is what causes the out-of-range vmalloc access.