From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Romain Lenglet <rlenglet@domain.hid>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Future of fusion
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:42:58 +0900
References: <000d01c5cfcb$8b5dfaf0$0600a8c0@domain.hid>
	<200510131146.04013.bdi-emc@domain.hid>
	<17230.50005.610300.142351@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <17230.50005.610300.142351@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510141242.59134.rlenglet@domain.hid>
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org

>  > Gilles already has a tarball of the Debian rules I used for
>  > packaging fusion. With minor changes, these could be used
>  > for a Xenomai package. One possibility is to use the rules
>  > and the compile farm to produce "ready to run"
>  > kernel/Xenomai Debian packages.
>
> Well, quite frankly, I do not know much about the debian
> packages creation process, in any case not enough to do the
> work which remains to be done. The best I can do is add the
> debian directory to the svn repository, letting volunteers
> work on it and submit patches...

I have proposed a few improvements for the Debian packaging in 
"wish" #4523:
https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=4523

-- 
Romain Lenglet