All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: Re: VFS: file-max limit 50044 reached
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:01:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051017183124.GF13665@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4353E6F1.8030206@cosmosbay.com>

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Dipankar Sarma a écrit :
> >On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:16:25AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> 
> <lazy_mode=ON>
> Do we really need a TIF_RCUUPDATE flag, or could we just ask for a resched ?
> </lazy_mode>

I think the theory was that we have to process the callbacks,
not just force the grace period by setting need_resched.
That is what TIF_RCUUPDATE indicates - rcus to process.

> This patch only take care of call_rcu(), I'm unsure of what can be done 
> inside call_rcu_bh()
> 
> The two stress program dont hit OOM anymore with this patch applied (even 
> with maxbatch=10)

Hmm.. I am supprised that maxbatch=10 still allowed you keep up
with a continuously queueing cpu. OK, I will look at this.

Thanks
Dipankar

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-17 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-15 13:19 VFS: file-max limit 50044 reached Serge Belyshev
2005-10-15 17:53 ` Serge Belyshev
2005-10-16 16:23   ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-16 18:51     ` Serge Belyshev
2005-10-16 18:56       ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17  2:19         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17  4:43           ` Serge Belyshev
2005-10-17  8:32           ` Jean Delvare
2005-10-17  8:46             ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17  9:10               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17  9:14                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-10-17  9:25                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 10:32                 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 12:10                   ` [RCU problem] was " Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 12:31                     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-17 12:36                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 13:28                       ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 13:33                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 14:54                         ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 15:42                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:01                     ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 16:16                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:29                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 18:01                           ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 18:31                             ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2005-10-17 19:00                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 18:37                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 19:12                               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 19:30                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 19:39                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 20:14                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 20:25                                       ` Christopher Friesen
2005-10-17 20:24                                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-18 15:55                                           ` Christopher Friesen
2005-10-17 20:38                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 20:33                                       ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 22:40                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 22:59                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-18  9:46                               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-18 16:22                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-17 18:15                           ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 18:40                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:23                       ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17 16:31                       ` Lee Revell
2005-10-17 16:20                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-10-17  2:34     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17  3:54       ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-17 11:54       ` Dipankar Sarma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051017183124.GF13665@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.