From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Fri Oct 21 04:09:31 2005 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] Integration with external clustering In-Reply-To: <20051020154244.GD11488@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> References: <43556F8B.3060105@suse.com> <20051018221849.GN11488@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20051018230323.GE2813@marowsky-bree.de> <20051018232752.GO11488@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20051019132624.GI24589@marowsky-bree.de> <4356BBE8.2080904@suse.com> <20051020102358.GB11726@marowsky-bree.de> <20051020150341.GC11488@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20051020152606.GB16745@redhat.com> <20051020154244.GD11488@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Message-ID: <20051021090937.GA30904@lst.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:42:44AM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:26:06AM -0500, David Teigland wrote: > > For some reason we've never used a mount.gfs so it didn't even cross my > > mind -- it sounds like the obvious way to go. That description I sent of > > how gfs mount interacts with the cluster bits may be changing now... > > Hehe, when you said "mount process..." in your description, I > assumed mount.gfs :-) You might want to rip off the > generic-mount-option-parsing code from mount.ocfs2 (which we ripped off > from mount.smb). Heh. Maybe you would be kind enough to rip it out from all of them and submit a patch to create a libmount or similar to the util-linux maintainer? ;-)