From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Patch: Fix pending timer stuck condition
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:19:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051021191923.GA5827@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A84303218896@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:02:48PM -0500, Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
> AMD recently discovered that on some hardware,
> there is a race condition possible when a C-state
> change request goes onto the bus at the same time
> as a P-state change request. Both requests happen,
> but the southbridge hardware only acknowledges the
> C-state change. The PowerNow! driver is then
> stuck in a loop, waiting for the P-state change
> acknowledgement. The driver eventually times out,
> but can no longer perform P-state changes.
>
> It turns out the solution is to resend the P-state
> change, which the southbridge will acknowledge
> normally.
>
> Thanks to Johannes Winkelmann for reporting this
> and testing the fix.
Excellent detective work!
I'll get this sent along to Linus for inclusion in 2.6.14
as there have been a number of reports of this.
One question though, this part..
- if (i++ > 0x1000000) {
+ if (i++ > 10000) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "detected change pending stuck\n");
return 1;
means that on affected hardware, we'll see that msg a lot more
regularly now. Was this intentional, or a leftover debugging change ?
Final nit, please add a Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
line for future patches. (I still apply them if they lack that line,
but following the established protocol is a nice bonus touch ;-)
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-21 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-21 18:02 Patch: Fix pending timer stuck condition Langsdorf, Mark
2005-10-21 19:19 ` Dave Jones [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-21 19:42 Langsdorf, Mark
2005-10-21 21:34 Devriendt, Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051021191923.GA5827@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.