From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1ET5Jj-0004WK-PH for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:24:51 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ET5Ji-0004VH-Uz for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:24:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ET5Ji-0004Uf-FP for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:24:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ET5Ji-0004UV-C2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:24:50 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ET5Ji-00068I-CK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:24:50 -0400 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CF03C7372BE for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 22 Oct 05 00:56:53 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:24:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200510211417.41141.T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk> <87ek6eo6nn.fsf@student.han.nl> In-Reply-To: <87ek6eo6nn.fsf@student.han.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510220024.48173.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: [patch] 64 bit disk address support (= 8192EiB disks) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:24:51 -0000 On Saturday 22 October 2005 12:18 am, Marco Gerards wrote: > > * include/grub/types.h (grub_lba_t): New typedef. > > Why did you choose this name? What about using grub_sector_t instead > as name? I think it is better to define grub_off_t as grub_uint64_t, and use grub_off_t. Okuji