diff for duplicates of <200510230853.14484.tomlins@cam.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 72690bf..299fbff 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,24 +1,19 @@ On Sunday 23 October 2005 04:35, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Transmitted 1000000 bytes in 103.183640 seconds (9.464 kbytes/s) -> >=20 -> > I see about the same with a bluetooth usb adapter. =A0Suspect that is a= -bout what -> > you should see with bluetooth - its not designed for speed. =A0It would= - be really=20 +> > +> > I see about the same with a bluetooth usb adapter. Suspect that is about what +> > you should see with bluetooth - its not designed for speed. It would be really > > nice to be wrong though... ->=20 +> > No, it is designed to do more. It should do around ~100 kbytes/sec > according to spec, and MSI dongle *does* do 25 kbytes/sec easily > against nokia 6230. Pavel, -Then the interesting test is to see if the delay is kernel or phone. Are = -you talking -to the same phone with both adapters? If so please copy me on any test pat= -ches as -I too have the same issue when talking to a pilot T3 using rfcomm using a "= -0a12:0001=20 +Then the interesting test is to see if the delay is kernel or phone. Are you talking +to the same phone with both adapters? If so please copy me on any test patches as +I too have the same issue when talking to a pilot T3 using rfcomm using a "0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)" usb dongle. I would _love_ to get 25K/s diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 62a1884..c67525b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -13,25 +13,20 @@ "b\0" "On Sunday 23 October 2005 04:35, Pavel Machek wrote:\n" "> > > Transmitted 1000000 bytes in 103.183640 seconds (9.464 kbytes/s)\n" - "> >=20\n" - "> > I see about the same with a bluetooth usb adapter. =A0Suspect that is a=\n" - "bout what\n" - "> > you should see with bluetooth - its not designed for speed. =A0It would=\n" - " be really=20\n" + "> > \n" + "> > I see about the same with a bluetooth usb adapter. \302\240Suspect that is about what\n" + "> > you should see with bluetooth - its not designed for speed. \302\240It would be really \n" "> > nice to be wrong though...\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> No, it is designed to do more. It should do around ~100 kbytes/sec\n" "> according to spec, and MSI dongle *does* do 25 kbytes/sec easily\n" "> against nokia 6230.\n" "\n" "Pavel,\n" "\n" - "Then the interesting test is to see if the delay is kernel or phone. Are =\n" - "you talking\n" - "to the same phone with both adapters? If so please copy me on any test pat=\n" - "ches as\n" - "I too have the same issue when talking to a pilot T3 using rfcomm using a \"=\n" - "0a12:0001=20\n" + "Then the interesting test is to see if the delay is kernel or phone. Are you talking\n" + "to the same phone with both adapters? If so please copy me on any test patches as\n" + "I too have the same issue when talking to a pilot T3 using rfcomm using a \"0a12:0001 \n" "Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)\" usb dongle.\n" "\n" "I would _love_ to get 25K/s\n" @@ -40,4 +35,4 @@ "\n" Ed Tomlinson -2d1c81815d8346a5126ef2d28551b0f72dc41395546f278d96c30e0afac70be1 +9ca176f025d8f5138d2ec72c5527ea57e984f090af151d1c3aad2b3d7ea7ad57
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.