From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Subject: xc_domain_getinfolist() declaration
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:03:41 -0400
Message-ID: <20051024150341.GQ2580@redhat.com>
Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

 I would expect xc_domain_getinfolist() to just be an extended version
of xc_domain_getinfo() but filling-up a range of xc_dominfo_t. However
the declaration in xenctrl.h is 

  int xc_domain_getinfolist(int xc_handle,
                            uint32_t first_domain,
			    unsigned int max_domains,
			    xc_domaininfo_t *info);

i.e. a different info pointer type than

  int xc_domain_getinfo(int xc_handle,
                        uint32_t first_domid,
			unsigned int max_doms,
			xc_dominfo_t *info);

is that a typo ? xc_domaininfo_t is defined as dom0_getdomaininfo_t
which is a distinct type from xc_dominfo_t, with slightly different 
characteristics. Any reason for that disparity in the type returned
between those two functions ?

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/