From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EUXCg-0005Wl-OK for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:23:34 -0700 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1EUXCf-0008G1-6g for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:23:34 -0700 From: Andi Kleen References: <20051025221105.21106.95194.stgit@zion.home.lan> <20051025221253.21106.22572.stgit@zion.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20051025221253.21106.22572.stgit@zion.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510260024.17241.ak@suse.de> Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86_64: fix L1_CACHE_SHIFT_MAX for Intel EM64T [for 2.6.14?] Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:24:16 +0200 To: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > No correctness issues, obviously. So this could even be merged for 2.6.14 > (I'm not a fan of this idea, though). I don't think it's a good idea to mess with this for 2.6.14 In general the maxaligned stuff is imho bogus and should be removed. That is what CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is for. It doesn't make sense imho to separate the variables in two aligned classes - either they should be aligned in all cases or they shouldn't. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932431AbVJYWXb (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:23:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932443AbVJYWXb (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:23:31 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:59582 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932431AbVJYWXa (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:23:30 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86_64: fix L1_CACHE_SHIFT_MAX for Intel EM64T [for 2.6.14?] Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:24:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20051025221105.21106.95194.stgit@zion.home.lan> <20051025221253.21106.22572.stgit@zion.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20051025221253.21106.22572.stgit@zion.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510260024.17241.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > No correctness issues, obviously. So this could even be merged for 2.6.14 > (I'm not a fan of this idea, though). I don't think it's a good idea to mess with this for 2.6.14 In general the maxaligned stuff is imho bogus and should be removed. That is what CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is for. It doesn't make sense imho to separate the variables in two aligned classes - either they should be aligned in all cases or they shouldn't. -Andi