From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964938AbVJZVjO (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:39:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964945AbVJZVjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:39:13 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34948 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964938AbVJZVjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:39:13 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai Subject: Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:39:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" References: <20051026070956.GA3561@localhost.localdomain> <200510261646.26331.ak@suse.de> <20051026202017.GA3841@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20051026202017.GA3841@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510262339.37326.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 26 October 2005 22:20, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > How's this? Looks good. There is a small inaccuracy in the help text for K8 - dual core single socket systems don't need NUMA - but I can fix that. -Andi