From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Welte Subject: Re: remaining libnetfilter_conntrack issues Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:55:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20051028215540.GC10568@rama.de.gnumonks.org> References: <20051028205955.GA10568@rama.de.gnumonks.org> <20051028210857.GB10568@rama.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT" Return-path: To: pablo@eurodev.net, Netfilter Development Mailinglist Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051028210857.GB10568@rama.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:08:57PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > [..] > Another comment: 8) IPv6 addresses are 128bit, not 64! --=20 - Harald Welte http://netfilter.org/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie --ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDYp5cXaXGVTD0i/8RAh/sAJ9l3cq7yMNHqmBcFiB7Ef/SwLEhLQCfc+xW 7/NwJvaNa00wx0FvjKmFT+M= =U8MN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT--