From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Johan Hedberg To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Device configuration permissions Message-ID: <20051031182652.GA10891@localhost.localdomain> References: <1130779899.5848.28.camel@blade> <20051031180235.GA10264@localhost.localdomain> <1130782992.5848.39.camel@blade> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1130782992.5848.39.camel@blade> Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ development List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:26:52 +0200 > > IMHO it would make it easier for the user to understand why some method > > doesn't work for him if the interface name had e.g. "admin" in it. I > > don't see how that makes the interface "horrible". > > because if people try to use another security policy/rules, then the > names "admin" etc. are still present even if in their case these are no > longer commands where you need special rights. Don't try to dictate > security rules through the interface. We can split the interface in > logical parts, but not only for the reason of writing easy rules. Ok. That sounds sensible :-) Thanks for the explanation! Johan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel