From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932078AbVKBAmF (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:42:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932081AbVKBAmF (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:42:05 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:16905 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932078AbVKBAmE (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:42:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:41:59 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Steven French Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, sfrench@samba.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL depend on EXPERIMENTAL Message-ID: <20051102004159.GB8009@stusta.de> References: <20051031111359.GI8009@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:21:36AM -0600, Steven French wrote: > > If users really remember that CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL does not enable anything > than it is probably a good idea - I'd express it differently: People interested in experimental options like CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL did already enable EXPERIMENTAL. > There is a minor problem - ie that there are some features in CIFS that > with 2.6.14 out are no longer really experimental that need to be pulled > out of the ifdef. I have a pretty big cifs merge to do, but I have no > real problem with your patch (we have enough time to add one or two more > cifs config options, clean up others) I don't see any problem with this. It's quite normal that code moves out of an EXPERIMENTAL option once it's matured. > Steve French cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed