All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: davidm@mostang.com (David Mosberger-Tang)
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] align signal-frame even when not using alternate signal-stack
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 06:40:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051103064019.5B552B3421@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

[IA64] align signal-frame even when not using alternate signal-stack

At the moment, attempting to invoke a signal-handler on the normal
stack is guaranteed to fail if the stack-pointer happens not to be
16-byte aligned.  This is because the signal-trampoline will attempt
to store fp-regs with stf.spill instructions, which will trap for
misaligned addresses.  This isn't terribly useful behavior.  It's
better to just always align the signal frame to the next lower 16-byte
boundary.  (Lightly) tested patch attached below.

Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <David.Mosberger@acm.org>

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -387,15 +387,14 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction
 	     struct sigscratch *scr)
 {
 	extern char __kernel_sigtramp[];
-	unsigned long tramp_addr, new_rbs = 0;
+	unsigned long tramp_addr, new_rbs = 0, new_sp;
 	struct sigframe __user *frame;
 	long err;
 
-	frame = (void __user *) scr->pt.r12;
+	new_sp = scr->pt.r12;
 	tramp_addr = (unsigned long) __kernel_sigtramp;
-	if ((ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) && sas_ss_flags((unsigned long) frame) = 0) {
-		frame = (void __user *) ((current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size)
-					 & ~(STACK_ALIGN - 1));
+	if ((ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) && sas_ss_flags(new_sp) = 0) {
+		new_sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
 		/*
 		 * We need to check for the register stack being on the signal stack
 		 * separately, because it's switched separately (memory stack is switched
@@ -404,7 +403,7 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction
 		if (!rbs_on_sig_stack(scr->pt.ar_bspstore))
 			new_rbs = (current->sas_ss_sp + sizeof(long) - 1) & ~(sizeof(long) - 1);
 	}
-	frame = (void __user *) frame - ((sizeof(*frame) + STACK_ALIGN - 1) & ~(STACK_ALIGN - 1));
+	frame = (void __user *) ((new_sp - sizeof(*frame)) & -STACK_ALIGN);
 
 	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
 		return force_sigsegv_info(sig, frame);

             reply	other threads:[~2005-11-03  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-03  6:40 David Mosberger-Tang [this message]
2005-11-03  7:34 ` [patch] align signal-frame even when not using alternate signal-stack Keith Owens
2005-11-03 18:20 ` David Mosberger-Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051103064019.5B552B3421@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=davidm@mostang.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.