From: Horms <horms@debian.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>,
debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ancient ieee80211/ipw2200 drivers in recent kernel (2.6.14)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:29:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051104032918.GE4708@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051102162620.GA32696@infradead.org>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:26:21PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:54:09PM +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> > So, having in mind the two levels of 'stablenesss': kernel
> > 'stableness' and modules 'stableness' :) we should find the way to
> > exclude discussed modules from the build, because in-kernel versions
> > will always be, erm..., slightly (1.0.0 is mentioned only as 'stone
> > age' in the mailing list of ipw2200 developers) outdated due to fact
> > integration and testing gets some time in upstream kernels. I propose
> > just to disable compilation of this drivers: everyone will be able to
> > compile the recent version using ipw2200-source we provide.
>
> The kernel drivers aren't stable but obsolete. Because of that ever
> distribution that supports it's users must patch in a more recent one,
> which is what we should do for debian aswell.
>
> It's a pity the braindead Intel policies don't allow us to have an uptodate
> driver in mainline.
Christoph,
do I take that comment to mean that upstream can't update the
drivers but Debian can? And if so, do you recommend updating
Debian's kernel packages, or putting the updates elsewhere?
--
Horms
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-04 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <873bmg9sym.fsf@vertex.dottedmag.net>
2005-11-02 2:09 ` ancient ieee80211/ipw2200 drivers in recent kernel (2.6.14) Horms
2005-11-02 3:44 ` Alejandro Bonilla Beeche
2005-11-02 6:54 ` Mikhail Gusarov
2005-11-02 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-04 3:29 ` Horms [this message]
2005-11-05 0:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-05 8:25 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051104032918.GE4708@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@debian.org \
--cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
--cc=dottedmag@dottedmag.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.