All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] What's different about building for x86-64?
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:38:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511040938.35735.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051104160402.GA4379@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>

On Friday 04 November 2005 10:04, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:07:03AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > My build is basically extracting the 2.6.14 tarball, adding the squashfs
> > patch, and then doing this:
> >
> > make ARCH=um O=../linux-build allnoconfig &&
>
> I would start with a make defconfig.  This smacks of a mangled
> configuration.

Actually, he turned out to be using an older version of my firmware linux 
build script (the one with the 2.6.13.2 kernel, from the website), and the 
problem he was seeing is that building on an x86-64 machine in 32 bit 
emulation mode gets confused.

Once he started building in 64 bit mode, he got past that, but then hit the 3 
level page tables leak from 2.6.13 shortly thereafter.  I sent him a new 
build script using 2.6.14 and still am waiting to hear back...

Thanks,

Rob


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-04 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-04 14:07 [uml-devel] What's different about building for x86-64? Rob Landley
2005-11-04 16:04 ` Jeff Dike
2005-11-04 15:38   ` Rob Landley [this message]
2005-11-04 17:01     ` Blaisorblade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200511040938.35735.rob@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.