From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EY5JP-0006Jn-J7 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:25:11 -0800 Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.36]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EY5JL-0002RX-VP for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:25:11 -0800 From: Blaisorblade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] What's different about building for x86-64? References: <200511040807.03708.rob@landley.net> <20051104160402.GA4379@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200511040938.35735.rob@landley.net> In-Reply-To: <200511040938.35735.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511041801.33833.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:01:32 +0100 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Rob Landley , Jeff Dike On Friday 04 November 2005 16:38, Rob Landley wrote: > On Friday 04 November 2005 10:04, Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:07:03AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > > My build is basically extracting the 2.6.14 tarball, adding the > > > squashfs patch, and then doing this: > > > > > > make ARCH=um O=../linux-build allnoconfig && > > > > I would start with a make defconfig. This smacks of a mangled > > configuration. > Actually, he turned out to be using an older version of my firmware linux > build script (the one with the 2.6.13.2 kernel, from the website), and the > problem he was seeing is that building on an x86-64 machine in 32 bit > emulation mode gets confused. > Once he started building in 64 bit mode, he got past that, but then hit the > 3 level page tables leak from 2.6.13 shortly thereafter. Don't you know that I maintain a kernel tree exactly for this purpose? The fix is included starting from 2.6.13-bs1. And I've even merged it upstream in -stable (even if it was merged in .4 only). > I sent him a new > build script using 2.6.14 and still am waiting to hear back... -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel