From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:56:45 +0000 Subject: Re: div, udiv, mul, umul, rem, urem broken again?!? Message-Id: <20051106.125645.09897025.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <1128550254.2140.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1128550254.2140.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org From: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 22:13:39 -0600 > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 16:40 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > I think I missed the idea whilst trying to implement > > your suggestion, as below, but it will not compile: > > Whoever "fixes" this issue, please test with module-init-tools as part > of the confirmation process. It's never fun to discover that kernel > modules just don't work. If I do the work I'll send you a patch to test since I lack any 32-bit sparc system on which to test this.