From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EYnKK-0004vE-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:25:04 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EYnKJ-0004uz-4J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:25:03 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EYnKI-0004uw-Pr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:25:02 -0500 Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EYnKI-0000PJ-Ss for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:25:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:24:48 -0500 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu and (Pacifica | Vanderpool) Message-ID: <20051106162448.GA20196@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <200511061019.18720.dfeustel@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511061019.18720.dfeustel@verizon.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dave Feustel Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:19:18AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization > facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool technogies? > > Thanks, > Dave Feustel qemu can't use these, since they dont help running PPC code on x86 or x86 code on a PPC or ARM code on an x86. kqemu/qvm86 could. kqemu probably will at some point since it is Fabrice's intention to turn kqemu into something like VMware. -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.