From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EZdoo-0002Vr-TR for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:28:02 -0800 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1EZdon-0004XV-F7 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:28:02 -0800 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Making UML Single Threader References: <200511061723.32848.rob@landley.net> <200511080109.06999.rob@landley.net> <20051108154618.GB4131@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20051108154618.GB4131@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511081827.46640.rob@landley.net> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:27:46 -0600 To: Jeff Dike Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Can Sar On Tuesday 08 November 2005 09:46, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:09:06AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > > So I don't care about systemcall interception or anything like that, > > > > *blink* *blink* > > > > Ok, you want user mode linux, but you don't want it to actually run user > > processes, nor do want it to be able to intercept system calls. > > > > Um... What's left? > > Only all of Linux. It so happens that I want exactly the same thing for > libUML, except I haven't had time to do anything about it. > > Try to think a little before calling someone's project dumb. Sorry, wasn't trying to call it dumb. (I linked to a similar patch for ripping out lots of "unnecessary" infrastructure, which Rik found dumb because there was really no advantage to removing it. I should have clarified that _my_ question was "Why?".) I didn't understand what he was trying to do. (Hard to ponder implementing something if you don't know what it would do.) A test harness for isolated kernel functions is something I can at least imagine... Rob ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel