From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave C Boutcher Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.14 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:07:09 -0600 Message-ID: <20051109150709.GA19002@cs.umn.edu> References: <1131207491.3614.5.camel@mulgrave> <20051108233546.GA21618@cs.umn.edu> <20051109050911.GA3202@infradead.org> Reply-To: boutcher@cs.umn.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.cs.umn.edu ([128.101.33.102]:7822 "EHLO mail.cs.umn.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750936AbVKIPHN (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:07:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051109050911.GA3202@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:09:11AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 05:35:46PM -0600, Dave C Boutcher wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 10:18:11AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > > > This is Part I of the pending SCSI patches (I still need to go over all > > > the flood that came in after 2.6.14 was declared). > > > > > > This patch is available from: > > > > > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-for-linus-2.6.git > > > > James, I note that my favorite masterpiece of ibmvscsis.c is not > > currently included. Does that fall into part of the "flood"? > > it shouldn't go in. we already have a version using the proper target > framework, that should be imroved upon to get production quality and then > merged. My only problem with that is the amount of time it is going to keep the driver out of the tree. I'm happy to commit to merging to a converged infrastructure as soon as it is available. -- Dave Boutcher